QuickLaunch

Answer to GAR Questions received 12/03/09

Posted: Friday, December 04, 2009

The Pee Dee LWIA offers the following answer to a question received 12/03/09:

1. "Over the past couple of years we [the existing Marlboro County Adult and Dislocated Worker intensive services provider] have shared a Business Services Representative with [the]Dillon [service provider]. Should I include this position in my proposal or work it out with [the Dillon County intensive services provider] to continue this relationship if [they are] willing to do so?"

It is the LWIA's understanding that the current arrangement is that the Dillon County provider budgets a full-time BSR, who spends a portion of her time providing job development activities for Marlboro County. The Marlboro County service provider presently reimburses the Dillon County provider for the travel costs incurred by the Business Services Representative when she is conducting job development activities for Marlboro County, but pays no portion of this individual's salary.

The offeror should proceed with the assumption that the existing relationship between service providers in Dillon and Marlboro Counties will continue; therefore, any entity bidding for Dillon County Intensive Services should budget a full-time BSR and any entity bidding for Marlboro County Intensive Services should budget travel costs for a BSR. When an award decision has been made, the LWIA staff reserves the right to negotiate changes to this arrangement with the successful offeror(s) for each of these counties.

ť See more Articles Of Interest

White Paper

2010 IWT Funds Available

Answer to GAR Questions received 12/09/09

Closest Location

Select the county you live in from the drop down box below.

One-Stop Workshops

Download the latest Pee Dee One-Stop Workshop Calendar. Available in PDF form

E-Newsletter Subscription

Sign up for the Pee Dee WIB's One Stop News Stop E-Newsletter.